Neocon Vs. Neocon
Today Iran has ignored once again another UN passed resolution deadline for ending uranium enrichment which Tehran maintains is a necessary and sovereign right of the Iranian nation's nuclear ambitions.
Surprise, surprise! For the first time in roughly two years of diverse news coverage of drama between Washington & Tehran the Irish Scotsman describes the unfolding story in the appropriate context. That of hostility and arrogance passed to and fro the respective neo-conservative regimes. In well informed circles in the United States it is known that the neocon movement is the culmination of Straussian political philosophy and reactions of conniving e.g. Donald Rumsfeld, conservative politician to liberalism. Beginning in the 1960's a similar reaction to liberalism took hold in Egypt inspired by Saeed Kotub, whose Jihadist ideology paved the way for militant Islamists like Aymen Zwahari. The premise of the neocon movements was to lead their populous out of what Strauss & Kotub deemed the rippling clutches of liberalism. The means by which the different schools of neoconservatives managed to establish their brands of governance was based on targeted propaganda and violence aimed at propagating social myths, fears, and tensions.


